writing-review

Automate writing reviews by classifying content and dispatching framework checks for readability, voice consistency, and sentence-level errors. The tool evaluates tutorials, references, and guides, then synthesizes findings for final fixes before you ship docs.

Run readability metrics and fresh-eyes checks by invoking the review workflow on user-facing text like essays or explanations. It operates sentence-level evaluations using Orwell and Williams frameworks, calculates readability, and synthesizes results into actionable feedback.

Yes, the writing review tool works with tutorials and reference docs by classifying input content and applying DQTI or Diátaxis framework evaluations. It selects relevant evaluations based on the identified content type to ensure appropriate documentation checks.

Yes, you can check voice consistency across technical guides and persuasive essays. The tool classifies content types including guides and persuasive text, then runs targeted framework evaluations to assess voice consistency alongside sentence-level checks.

Automated framework checks for content evaluation are limited to user-facing text and are not designed for code or design review. It processes text classifications like tutorials or essays but does not evaluate software architecture or visual design elements.

The writing-review process classifies text as tutorial, reference, explanation, guide, persuasive, or essay, then dispatches sub-agents to run applicable framework skills independently. It synthesizes findings from readability metrics and fresh-eyes reviews for final fixes.