writing-user-outputs

Standardize user-facing CLI messages across Worktrunk commands.

6.4k|231|Updated Oct 17, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/max-sixty/worktrunk --skill writing-user-outputs
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: writing-user-outputs
Source: https://github.com/max-sixty/worktrunk/tree/main/.claude/skills/writing-user-outputs
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/max-sixty/worktrunk --skill writing-user-outputs

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill standardizes CLI output to improve user communication and consistency in Worktrunk across commands and sessions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Ensures consistent formatting of user-facing messages, errors, progress indicators, hints, and warnings.
  • Enables cohesive shell integration prompts and post-action guidance across the Worktrunk CLI.
  • Use Case: Apply standardized messaging when presenting task progress, success, or failure to users in automation scripts.

Quick Start

Use the writing-user-outputs skill to standardize messages across Worktrunk commands like wt switch, wt list, and wt config.

Frequently Asked Questions about writing-user-outputs

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I standardize CLI output formatting for consistent user messages?

Standardize CLI output formatting by applying consistent styling to user-facing messages, errors, progress indicators, hints, and warnings across Worktrunk commands and sessions to improve communication.

What is the best way to format CLI error messages and progress indicators?

Format CLI error messages and progress indicators by enforcing sectioned guidance and standardizing all user-facing shell integration prompts to ensure cohesive post-action guidance across the Worktrunk CLI.

How do I apply consistent CLI styling across different shell commands?

Apply consistent CLI styling across shell commands by using a frontmatter-driven description in SKILL.md that enforces dependencies, components, and safety checks for self-contained, standardized output units.

Can I use this output formatting approach for automation script messaging?

Yes, you can use this output formatting approach for automation script messaging to present standardized task progress, success, or failure messages to users during command execution.

Does standardizing user messages require any external dependencies?

Standardizing user messages requires no external dependencies, ensuring the skill remains a self-contained, safe unit with built-in safety checks for consistent CLI output across Worktrunk commands.

When do I need standardized output formatting for CLI applications?

You need standardized output formatting for CLI applications when ensuring cohesive shell integration prompts, consistent error handling, and clear user communication across multiple commands like wt switch, wt list, and wt config.