x-review

Orchestrate multi-agent code reviews on diffs, PRs, or files.

1|Updated Mar 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/x-mesh/x-kit --skill x-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: x-review
Source: https://github.com/x-mesh/x-kit/tree/main/x-review/skills/review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/x-mesh/x-kit --skill x-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires git, gh, Claude Code Agent, and includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) and assets (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill addresses the need for comprehensive and efficient code reviews by leveraging multiple perspectives to analyze code quality, providing severity-rated findings, and issuing a final LGTM (look good to me) or Request Changes verdict.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Multi-Perspective Code Review: Analyzes code from security, logic, performance, and test coverage angles.
  • Automated Review Process: Orchestrate reviews with parallel processing and a consolidated report.
  • Customizable Lenses: Customize the review lenses (e.g., security, logic, performance) for specific needs.
  • Integration with x-build: Seamlessly integrate with x-build for quality gate checks.

Quick Start

Start a review by invoking the x-review skill with the appropriate subcommand. For example, to review a PR, you can use: /xm:review pr <pr-number>

Frequently Asked Questions about x-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate multi-perspective code review for a pull request?

You can automate multi-perspective code review for a pull request by invoking the review skill with the PR number. It orchestrates a multi-agent process over code diffs to analyze security, logic, performance, and test coverage, providing a consolidated report.

What is a multi-perspective code review and how does it work?

Multi-perspective code review analyzes code quality from security, logic, performance, and test coverage angles simultaneously. It uses parallel processing across multiple agents to evaluate diffs and issues a final LGTM or Request Changes verdict based on severity-rated findings.

Do I need git and gh CLI tools to run automated code quality checks?

Yes, git and gh CLI tools are required dependencies to execute automated code quality checks. The multi-agent review process relies on these tools to fetch code diffs and orchestrate the analysis via the Claude Code Agent.

Can I customize the review lenses for security and performance analysis?

Yes, you can customize the review lenses for security and performance analysis based on specific needs. The multi-agent review process allows you to configure which perspectives are applied when evaluating code diffs and pull requests.

What's the best way to integrate code reviews with quality gate checks?

The best way to integrate code reviews with quality gate checks is by using the built-in integration with x-build. This allows the multi-perspective code review findings to seamlessly enforce quality gates within your software development workflow.

Why does my multi-agent code review process require parallel processing?

Multi-agent code review requires parallel processing to efficiently analyze code from multiple perspectives simultaneously. This orchestration method consolidates security, logic, and performance findings into a single report, accelerating the overall review cycle.