Trigger critical re-evaluation of assistant claims upon user pushback.
npx skills add https://github.com/SilvrDuck/skills --skill x-silvrduck
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: x Source: https://github.com/SilvrDuck/skills/tree/main/skills/x Command: npx skills add https://github.com/SilvrDuck/skills --skill x-silvrduck
It helps when you feel the assistant’s claim or plan is untrustworthy, shallow, or missing key context.
/x as a cue to critically review what was just produced.When you notice the assistant’s output seems incorrect or overconfident, tell the agent to activate the x skill to re-check the work skeptically.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
Trigger critical re-evaluation by using the /x command or the doubt meme to prompt the assistant to re-examine its recent claim or plan with fresh skepticism. This applies to review and debugging scenarios where assumptions should be challenged and prior steps verified.
Assumption checking in AI debugging is the process of testing an assistant's prior steps and assumptions for gaps or errors. It works by injecting doubt instructions into the context when you provide pushback, forcing a skeptical review of the generated output.
To stop an AI assistant from being overconfident without debating tone, use /x to trigger a re-examination. This focuses the assistant on testing assumptions and checking for missing context rather than capitulating or defending its original claim.
Yes, you can use the 'press x' meme convention to challenge an AI's argument evaluation. The /x command acts as a meme alias that triggers the exact same doubt behavior, optionally accepting a brief hunch argument to guide the skeptical review.
No special setup or dependencies are required to use the x skill for debugging. You simply need to instruct the agent to activate the skill when you notice its output seems incorrect, shallow, or untrustworthy, and it will inject the necessary doubt instructions.
LeeSandersonVerify AI claims with code execution, file reads, or search results.
human-avatarDiagnose flawed reasoning and apply structured logical methods to validate or repair arguments.
gqy20Diagnose argument quality by identifying hidden assumptions and logical gaps.
carlkiblerPlan parallel isolated testing setups for desktop apps.