xai-check

Audit AI product explainability against Doshi-Velez & Kim's tiered evaluation.

42|3|Updated Apr 7, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/haabe/mycelium --skill xai-check
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: xai-check
Source: https://github.com/haabe/mycelium/tree/main/plugins/mycelium/skills/xai-check
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/haabe/mycelium --skill xai-check

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires mycelium, and includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill addresses the need for an in-depth explainability audit for AI products, ensuring they meet defensible XAI standards.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Risk Classification: Evaluates AI components based on risk tiers for regulatory compliance.
  • Stakeholder Matrix: Assesses answerability of AI systems for various stakeholders.
  • Fidelity Audit: Reviews LLM-generated rationales for faithfulness to system outputs.
  • System Card Check: Verifies publication of system cards detailing AI features and limitations.
  • Recourse Path Test: Ensures a clear human review process for AI decisions.

Quick Start

Run /mycelium:xai-check to initiate the Explainability Audit for your AI product.

Frequently Asked Questions about xai-check

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I conduct an AI explainability audit for regulatory compliance?

An AI explainability audit evaluates product components against tiered evaluation, stakeholder matrices, and fidelity checks to ensure XAI compliance. This process verifies system cards and recourse paths for AI Act adherence using the Mycelium framework.

What is Doshi-Velez & Kim tiered evaluation in XAI audits?

Doshi-Velez & Kim tiered evaluation is a framework assessing AI system explainability across multiple levels of abstraction. The audit uses this methodology to validate that rationales generated by AI systems are faithful and answerable to stakeholders.

Do I need the Mycelium framework to run an AI Act compliance check?

Yes, the Mycelium framework is required to run this AI Act compliance check. It provides the foundational environment needed to detect AI components and execute the explainability audit scripts.

How do I verify LLM fidelity and system cards for AI products?

To verify LLM fidelity and system cards, the audit reviews LLM-generated rationales for faithfulness to system outputs and checks the publication of system cards detailing AI features and limitations. This ensures full transparency and regulatory compliance.

What is the best way to test recourse paths in AI systems?

Testing recourse paths involves ensuring a clear human review process exists for AI decisions. The audit performs a recourse path test to validate that users have actionable mechanisms to challenge and review automated AI outcomes.

When do I need a stakeholder matrix for AI risk assessment?

A stakeholder matrix is needed during AI risk assessment to evaluate the answerability of systems for various stakeholders. It maps explainability requirements to specific user groups, ensuring AI components meet defensible XAI standards across different risk tiers.