xhaudit

Audit a colleague's work by reading team chats and progress files.

Updated Jun 13, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/kaiangel/prefaceai --skill xhaudit
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: xhaudit
Source: https://github.com/kaiangel/prefaceai/tree/main/.claude/skills/xhaudit
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/kaiangel/prefaceai --skill xhaudit

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill enables product managers to perform independent, thorough reviews of a colleague's work by aggregating insights from team chats and all related documents, ensuring accountability and high-quality output.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Independent Review: Read team chats and all related documentation to form a complete understanding of the colleague's work.
  • Context Correlation: Cross-reference progress files (e.g., .claude/agents/{agent}-progress/) and related artifacts to verify alignment with tasks and acceptance criteria.
  • Structured Deliverable: Produce a clear, actionable review with conclusions, risks, and recommendations for improvements.
  • Use Case: A PM wants to verify a colleague's implementation work against the stated requirements before acceptance.

Quick Start

Audit the specified colleague's work by reading the team chat and all related documents to produce a comprehensive review.

Frequently Asked Questions about xhaudit

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I conduct an independent peer review of a product manager's work against acceptance criteria?

Independent peer review of a product manager's work involves reading team chat histories and cross-referencing all related documents to verify alignment with tasks and acceptance criteria. This process assesses accuracy and completeness to produce a structured review with actionable recommendations.

What is the best way to audit team chat and progress files for project management accountability?

Auditing team chat and progress files for project management accountability requires cross-referencing chat histories with progress files in .claude/agents/*-progress/ directories. This verifies that implementation work aligns with stated requirements and identifies potential risks or gaps in documentation.

Can I use this peer audit process for large volumes of team chat history?

Yes, this peer audit process supports large volumes of team chat history by systematically reading and extracting insights from chat logs. It correlates these conversations with related artifacts to form a complete understanding of the colleague's work and accountability.

Does the structured review output include conclusions and actionable recommendations?

The structured review output includes clear conclusions, identified risks, and actionable recommendations for improvements. It aggregates insights from team chats and related documentation to deliver a comprehensive assessment of the colleague's implementation work.

What limitations exist when cross-referencing progress files and related documents during a peer audit?

Limitations during a peer audit include the reliance on the completeness of progress files in .claude/agents/ directories and the accuracy of related documents. The audit's effectiveness depends on the availability and consistency of the team chat logs and artifacts being cross-referenced.