youth-safety-review

To review FTC student code, this skill scans variable names, comments, strings, and documentation to flag inappropriate language or sensitive data exposure, generating a review report for mentors to assess before publishing student projects.

A youth-safety code review identifies unsuitable language or unsafe references in student code. Mentors need it during review and publishing workflows to ensure FTC student projects remain age-appropriate before sharing publicly.

Yes, you can automate content appropriateness checks for student code. The skill scans comments, variable names, and strings to flag potential issues, while providing a human-review workflow for mentors to make final contextual decisions.

Yes, the code review process catches sensitive data exposure in student submissions. It implements automated checks specifically for sensitive data alongside age-appropriate language detection across all code and documentation.

The best way to handle flagged inappropriate terms is through the built-in human-review workflow. The automated checks flag offensive terms and unsafe references, then mentors review the context and decide on appropriate resolutions for each flagged item.

Automated language checks for youth code safety cannot assess context independently. The skill addresses this limitation by providing a human-review workflow where mentors evaluate flagged items to ensure contextual accuracy before finalizing resolutions.