ywc-impl-review

Execute parallel multi-agent conformance reviews across architecture, design, security, and QA domains.

8|1|Updated May 13, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/yongwoon/ywc-agent-toolkit --skill ywc-impl-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ywc-impl-review
Source: https://github.com/yongwoon/ywc-agent-toolkit/tree/main/claude-code/skills/ywc-impl-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/yongwoon/ywc-agent-toolkit --skill ywc-impl-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires python3, gh, uv, ripgrep, and includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill addresses the gap between code completion and PR creation by performing a rigorous, multi-dimensional conformance review, ensuring that implementation aligns with specifications and quality standards before human review.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Five-Axis Verification: Simultaneously evaluates Architecture, Design, Devex, Security, and QA using specialized subagents.
  • Two-Phase Advisor Pattern: Uses Sonnet/Haiku for mechanical checks and escalates only ambiguous findings to an Opus advisor to maximize frontier model efficiency.
  • Use Case: Before submitting a complex backend API PR, run this skill to catch structural boundary violations, OWASP security risks, and missing test cases that would otherwise block the merge.

Quick Start

Run the ywc-impl-review skill on the current working tree to validate your implementation against the project specification.

Frequently Asked Questions about ywc-impl-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code review for architecture, security, and QA before a PR?

Automated code review across architecture, security, and QA is performed by executing parallel multi-agent reviews on specific git ranges to validate structural integrity, contract adherence, and security compliance against project specifications.

What is multi-axis implementation conformance verification?

Multi-axis implementation conformance verification is a process that simultaneously evaluates Architecture, Design, Devex, Security, and QA domains using specialized subagents to ensure code aligns with specifications before human review.

How do I check code paths for OWASP security risks and structural boundary violations?

Checking specific code paths for OWASP security risks and structural boundary violations is done by targeting specific git ranges and running parallel multi-agent reviews that escalate ambiguous findings to a higher-tier advisor for prioritized remediation.

Does this implementation review tool require python3 and ripgrep?

Yes, this implementation review tool requires python3, ripgrep, uv, and gh installed in your environment to execute its two-phase mechanical analysis and advisor escalation pattern.

What's the best way to resolve ambiguous security findings during an automated code review?

Resolving ambiguous security findings during automated code review is handled by a two-phase advisor pattern that escalates only uncertain results from mechanical checks to an Opus-tier advisor to maximize frontier model efficiency and prioritize remediation.

When should I use a multi-agent code review instead of a standard linter?

Use a multi-agent code review instead of a standard linter when you need to validate complex backend API PRs for structural boundary violations, contract adherence, and missing test cases across five distinct quality dimensions before merging.