zenigame-fx-codex-review

Manages standardized Chest.Imaging.Protocols for radiotherapy treatment planning in the RICADeV project.

Updated Apr 17, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/kent013/zenigame-fx --skill zenigame-fx-codex-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: zenigame-fx-codex-review
Source: https://github.com/kent013/zenigame-fx/tree/main/.claude/skills/zenigame-fx-codex-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/kent013/zenigame-fx --skill zenigame-fx-codex-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Codex reviews and prompt governance are centralized to ensure consistent safety, mission adherence, and session management across zenigame-fx Codex interactions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Centralized governance: consolidates mission statements, prohibitions, and session handling for Codex reviews.
  • Consistent prompt augmentation: prepends mandatory guidelines to every Codex prompt to enforce safety and project rules.
  • Session management: supports one-shot and session-based review rounds with structured prompts and retry handling.
  • Audit-ready workflow: provides a guardrail for review, prompt templates, and toxicity checks to reduce risk.

Use cases include: standardizing Codex prompt reviews for zenigame-fx, performing multi-round design and implementation reviews, and ensuring non-deviation from policy during automated Codex calls.

Quick Start

Run the codex review flow by invoking the prepared prompt template via scripts/codex exec to start a governed analysis session.

Frequently Asked Questions about zenigame-fx-codex-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I enforce safety checks and governance rules for automated Codex prompt reviews?

You can enforce safety checks for Codex prompt reviews by centralizing mission statements and prohibitions, automatically prepending mandatory guidelines to every Codex call to ensure strict policy adherence.

What is the best way to standardize prompt structures for multi-round design and implementation reviews?

Standardizing multi-round design and implementation reviews requires enforcing a fixed prompt structure that handles structured review rounds, toxicity validation, and retry handling across both ephemeral and session modes.

Can I use session-based review rounds instead of one-shot calls for Codex governance?

Yes, session management supports both one-shot and session-based review rounds, allowing you to maintain structured prompts and retry handling throughout complex, multi-step Codex analysis workflows.

How do I validate toxic content before sending prompts to Codex in an automated workflow?

To validate toxic content in automated workflows, the governance process applies toxicity checks to the prompt structure before execution, reducing risk and ensuring non-deviation from project safety rules.

Do I need any external dependencies to run governed Codex review sessions?

No external dependencies are required to run governed Codex review sessions; you can invoke the prepared prompt template via scripts to start a governed analysis session immediately within your environment.

Why does my Codex review session deviate from the project mission statement during automated calls?

Codex review sessions deviate from the mission statement when mandatory guidelines are not prepended to every prompt; centralizing governance ensures consistent mission adherence and prevents non-compliant automated calls.