zenigame-plan-and-design

Merge Claude and Codex analyses into actionable GA improvement plans.

Updated Apr 17, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/kent013/zenigame-fx --skill zenigame-plan-and-design
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: zenigame-plan-and-design
Source: https://github.com/kent013/zenigame-fx/tree/main/.claude/skills/_archived/zenigame-plan-and-design
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/kent013/zenigame-fx --skill zenigame-plan-and-design

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Alpha FactoryのGA改善計画を統合的かつ再現可能な方法で設計・実行するための枠組みを提供します。Claude分析とCodexのフィードバックを組み合わせ、Phase AのTODO選定、Phase Bの分析マージ、Phase Cの詳細設計を横断して、実装可能な改善計画と設計成果物を生成します。

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Claude分析とCodexレビューを統合し、GA改善の実行計画を統一的に導出する。
  • 主要成果物として selected_todos、analysis-merged.md、improvement-plan.md、detailed-design.md を自動生成・管理する。
  • Phase A/B/C の各サイクルに向けて状態を追跡し、透明性のある意思決定と再現性を確保する。

Quick Start

Run the plan-and-design workflow to generate the final improvement plan and detailed designs from the latest analyses.

Frequently Asked Questions about zenigame-plan-and-design

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I consolidate Claude and Codex analysis insights into an actionable improvement plan?

To consolidate Claude and Codex analysis insights into an actionable improvement plan, identify and merge feedback to define tasks for the GA cycle, applying the results across Phase A todo selection, Phase B analysis merge, and Phase C detailed design.

What state files and artifacts are needed to track Alpha Factory improvement plans across phases?

Tracking Alpha Factory improvement plans requires state files and artifacts like selected_todos, analysis-merged.md, improvement-plan.md, and detailed-design.md to ensure consistent documentation, traceable decisions, and explicit design rationale across phases.

How does Phase B analysis merge work when combining feedback for GA cycle improvements?

Phase B analysis merge works by consolidating the latest Claude and Codex analyses into a unified artifact, ensuring that insights are traceable and structured before moving into Phase C detailed design for the GA improvement cycle.

Can I use Codex feedback directly for Phase A todo selection without manual review?

You can use Codex feedback to inform Phase A todo selection, but the workflow applies it alongside Claude analysis to define actionable tasks, ensuring artifacts are generated with explicit design rationale suitable for downstream implementation and review.

What is the best way to generate detailed design artifacts from merged analysis for downstream implementation?

The best way to generate detailed design artifacts from merged analysis is to run the plan-and-design workflow, which processes Phase A/B/C cycles to produce improvement-plan.md and detailed-design.md with traceable decisions and consistent documentation for review.

Why does my improvement plan lack traceable decisions when merging Claude and Codex analyses?

An improvement plan lacks traceable decisions when the workflow does not properly link state files like selected_todos and analysis-merged.md, which are required to maintain consistent documentation and explicit design rationale across Phase A, B, and C.