skills.rest
andreyvit
andreyvitCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
WebsiteGitHub

zoo-uberreview

Review files under .zoo/review/ and synthesize findings into a prioritized report.

5|1|Updated Aug 22, 2025
Search Tags:#automation#repository#prioritization#risk-assessment#code-review#review-report#uberreview
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/andreyvit/zoo --skill zoo-uberreview
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: zoo-uberreview
Source: https://github.com/andreyvit/zoo/tree/main/.codex/skills/zoo-uberreview
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/andreyvit/zoo --skill zoo-uberreview

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Launches exhaustive per-file Uberreview reviews across all files under .zoo/review/ to ensure nothing is missed and every issue is surfaced.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Per-file reviewer orchestration: launches dedicated reviewer agents for each file under .zoo/review/ and aggregates findings into a single report.
  • Prioritized triage: categorizes findings into P1, P2, P3 with clear remediation guidance.
  • Cross-reference guidance: automatically consults policy files like .zoo/coding.md, .zoo/testing.md, .zoo/codereview.md, and planning docs when present.
  • Use Case: A repo with 5 review files gets a consolidated report highlighting critical blockers and suggested fixes.

Quick Start

Run the uberreview on the repository to produce a single consolidated report from all files under .zoo/review/.

Frequently Asked Questions about zoo-uberreview

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code review across an entire repository?▼

Automate repository code review by orchestrating dedicated subagents to analyze every file individually, extracting and categorizing findings into a single consolidated review report.

How does subagent-based code review prioritize issues?▼

Subagent-based code review prioritizes issues by categorizing findings into a hierarchical P1, P2, and P3 triage scheme, ensuring critical blockers are highlighted with clear remediation guidance.

Can I cross-reference custom coding and testing policies during an automated review?▼

Automated review can cross-reference custom guidance by automatically consulting policy files like .zoo/coding.md, .zoo/testing.md, and .zoo/codereview.md when present in the repository.

What is the best way to consolidate per-file review reports into one actionable summary?▼

Consolidate per-file review reports by aggregating subagent findings into a single deterministic output, validating completeness and providing actionable recommendations with risk labels.

Does automated review work for planning and architectural documents?▼

Automated review works for planning and architectural documents by applying the same subagent orchestration to files under .zoo/review/, cross-referencing planning docs like .zoo/planning.md.

Are there limitations to using subagents for exhaustive repository reviews?▼

Exhaustive repository reviews using subagents require files to be placed under the .zoo/review/ directory, limiting the scope of analysis to explicitly designated files within that structure.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
andreyvitandreyvit
5

zoo-init

Initialize .zoo customization files and verify Bureau MCP access.

Community
Intermediate
jovermierjovermier
1

quality-severity

Classify issues and code review findings into P1, P2, or P3 severity levels.

Community
Basic
langchain-ailangchain-ai
27.5k

web-research

Orchestrate multi-source web research with parallel subagents and cited reports.

Official
Advanced
jeremylongshorejeremylongshore

repo-scanning

Scan GitHub repositories to gather evidence for bug cluster analysis.

Community
Advanced