33-js-concepts
Master 33 essential JavaScript concepts with tested, verified guides
All Skills in This Repository (6)
Pure Emerald Level Indicatorstest-writer
Generate Vitest tests from code examples in JavaScript concept documentation pages.
fact-check
Verify JavaScript concept documentation against MDN and ECMAScript specifications.
write-concept
Generate MDX documentation pages for JavaScript concepts with required frontmatter and structure.
concept-workflow
Coordinate five sub-skills to publish JavaScript concept pages.
seo-review
Audit JavaScript concept pages for SEO gaps and optimization opportunities.
resource-curator
Audit and curate external resources for JavaScript concept pages.
Frequently Asked Questions
FAQPage SchemaHow to install 33-js-concepts?โผ
Run `npx skills add leonardomso/33-js-concepts --all -g -y` in your terminal to install all skills in this suite globally.
What are the 33 JavaScript concepts?โผ
They cover fundamentals like scope, closures, and the call stack, plus async topics like promises and the event loop, and advanced topics like prototypes, design patterns, and Big O notation.
How does the concept-workflow skill work?โผ
It runs five phases in order: curating resources, writing the guide, generating Vitest tests, fact-checking against MDN and the ECMAScript spec, and running an SEO audit.
Does it verify code examples are correct?โผ
Yes. The test-writer skill converts every code example into automated Vitest tests, and the fact-check skill verifies outputs, links, and technical claims.
Is 33-js-concepts good for interview preparation?โผ
Yes. Each concept includes clear explanations, working code examples, common mistakes, and curated articles and videos, making it a strong interview study reference.
Related Repositories in Education & Research
View All in Education & Researchโlearn-claude-code
Learn to build AI agent harnesses from scratch
ai-agents-for-beginners
Learn to build, deploy, and secure AI agents step by step
academic-research-skills
Full academic pipeline from research question to peer-reviewed paper