What problem does it solve?
When business owners use AI alone for marketing decisions, the AI tends to agree with them, producing one confident recommendation with no real challenge. This Skill simulates a marketing advisory board of five anonymous thinking archetypes to generate genuine disagreement, expose trade-offs, and identify what evidence would resolve each conflict before a direction is chosen.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Five Thinking Archetypes: Brand builder, direct seller, data believer, Vietnam customer expert, and cash-flow guardian, each with a distinct lens, signature questions, and known blind spots.
- Mandatory Dissenter: At least one archetype is assigned to argue against the direction the question is already leaning toward, preventing unanimous agreement.
- Disagreement Map: The core output lists 2-4 real conflicts, the underlying trade-off behind each, and the observable evidence that would resolve it.
- Chairperson Summary: Delivers a recommendation, states which opinions were overruled and why, assigns 2-4 concrete tasks, and sets observable warning milestones for revisiting the decision.
- Use Case: A founder torn between premium and mass-market positioning convenes the board, receives conflicting archetype opinions, and gets a disagreement map showing the real trade-off is short-term cash flow versus long-term brand equity, plus a two-week messaging test to resolve it.
Quick Start
Ask the AI to convene a marketing board to debate whether you should position your product as premium or mass-market given your current budget and customer base.
