academic-paper-reviewer

Simulates a five-reviewer peer review panel producing editorial decisions and revision roadmaps.

Updated May 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/baljinnyamday/autonomous-red-team-agent --skill academic-paper-reviewer-baljinnyamday
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: academic-paper-reviewer
Source: https://github.com/baljinnyamday/autonomous-red-team-agent/tree/main/submission/.agents/skills/academic-paper-reviewer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/baljinnyamday/autonomous-red-team-agent --skill academic-paper-reviewer-baljinnyamday

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve? Authors submitting academic papers lack access to realistic, multi-perspective peer review before submission, leaving methodological flaws, logical gaps, and missing literature undiscovered until real referees find them. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Multi-Perspective Review Panel: Simulates 5 independent reviewers (Editor-in-Chief, methodology, domain, cross-disciplinary perspective, and Devil's Advocate) with field-specific personas configured per paper. - Six Operational Modes: Full review, re-review (revision verification with traceability matrix), quick assessment, methodology-focus, Socratic guided review, and calibration mode that measures reviewer FNR/FPR against a gold set. - Structured Editorial Output: Produces an Editorial Decision Letter and prioritized Revision Roadmap that feeds directly into paper revision workflows. - Use Case: Before submitting a manuscript to a journal, run a full review to receive five independent reports, a Devil's Advocate counter-argument analysis, and an editorial decision with actionable revision priorities. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to review this paper and paste the manuscript text or provide the file path.

Frequently Asked Questions about academic-paper-reviewer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I get a simulated peer review of my academic paper?

Provide the manuscript text or file and request a review. The skill identifies the paper's field, configures five reviewer personas, runs independent reviews, and returns five reports plus an editorial decision letter and revision roadmap.

What review modes does academic paper review support?

Six modes are available: full review, re-review for verifying revisions, quick 15-minute assessment, methodology-focus, guided Socratic review, and calibration mode that measures reviewer accuracy against a labeled gold set of papers.

Can the reviewer verify that my revisions addressed earlier comments?

Yes, re-review mode takes the original revision roadmap, the revised manuscript, and an optional response letter, then produces a traceability matrix verifying each concern plus any residual issues and a new decision.

Does the simulated reviewer modify my manuscript?

No, the skill enforces a strict read-only constraint. Reviewers produce separate reports, decisions, and roadmaps and never edit the submitted manuscript itself.

How accurate is the AI reviewer's scoring?

Calibration mode measures the reviewer's false-negative rate, false-positive rate, and balanced accuracy against 5-20 user-labeled papers, running five ensembled reviews per paper and attaching the resulting confidence disclosure to subsequent reviews.