skills.rest
olaTechie
olaTechieCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

academic-paper-reviewer

Coordinate five reviewer personas to generate reports and an editorial decision.

Updated Mar 30, 2026
Search Tags:#peer-review#devils-advocate#revision-roadmap#higher-education#editorial-decision#academic-paper-reviewer
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/olaTechie/academic-research-plugin --skill academic-paper-reviewer-olatechie
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: academic-paper-reviewer
Source: https://github.com/olaTechie/academic-research-plugin/tree/main/skills/academic-paper-reviewer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/olaTechie/academic-research-plugin --skill academic-paper-reviewer-olatechie

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Automates the simulation of a complete multi-perspective peer review workflow by configuring five reviewer personas (EIC, Methodology, Domain, Perspective, Devil's Advocate) and generating five reports plus an editorial decision and revision roadmap.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Five independent reports (EIC, R1, R2, R3, DA) with domain-specific expertise
  • Dynamic reviewer configuration and Phase-based orchestration (Field Analysis → Phase 1 → Phase 2, Phase 2.5)
  • Editorial decision letter and revision roadmap compatible with standard tooling
  • Modes: full, re-review, quick, methodology-focus, guided
  • Templates and references for consistent editorial output

Quick Start

Submit a manuscript for full peer review and receive five reviewer reports plus a final editorial decision.

Frequently Asked Questions about academic-paper-reviewer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I simulate a multi-perspective peer review for an academic manuscript?▼

Simulated peer review works by configuring five distinct reviewer personas, including methodology, domain, and devil's advocate perspectives. The system orchestrates a phased workflow that generates five independent reports and compiles a final editorial decision with a revision roadmap.

Can I use automated peer review for education research manuscripts specifically?▼

Automated peer review supports education research contexts across full, re-review, and quick assessment modes. It generates domain-specific feedback aligned with standard templates for consistent editorial output in higher education research.

What is the best way to generate an editorial decision and revision roadmap for a paper?▼

Generating an editorial decision and revision roadmap is achieved through phase-based orchestration. It processes field analysis through multiple review stages to produce a unified decision letter and roadmap aligned with standard templates.

How do I handle re-reviewing a revised academic paper?▼

Re-reviewing a revised academic paper utilizes the dedicated revision-stage re-review mode. This mode re-evaluates the updated manuscript against initial reports to verify resolved issues and update the editorial decision.

Does this peer review workflow support a quick assessment mode?▼

Yes, the peer review workflow supports a quick assessment mode alongside full and methodology-focus options. This enables rapid manuscript evaluation without executing the complete phase-based orchestration process.

Related Skills

Explore More Education & Research Skills→
IranbIranb

academic-paper-reviewer

Automate academic paper peer review with simulated reviewer personas.

Community
Advanced
CRDong233CRDong233
3

academic-paper-reviewer

Generate five reviewer reports and an editorial decision with revision roadmap.

Community
Advanced
LadvienLadvien

academic-paper-reviewer

Automate academic paper reviews with multi-perspective reviewer personas and structured reports.

Community
Advanced
magnus919magnus919
86

copy-editor-methodology

Automate line-level editing and proofreading to enforce style, grammar, and consistency.

Community
Intermediate