academic-paper-reviewer

Automate academic paper peer review with simulated reviewer personas.

Updated May 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Iranb/codex-autoresearch-skill-pack --skill academic-paper-reviewer-iranb
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: academic-paper-reviewer
Source: https://github.com/Iranb/codex-autoresearch-skill-pack/tree/main/skills/academic-paper-reviewer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Iranb/codex-autoresearch-skill-pack --skill academic-paper-reviewer-iranb

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires python, and includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) and assets (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the peer review process for academic papers, providing comprehensive and multi-perspective feedback from a team of simulated reviewers.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Multi-Perspective Review: Simulates 5 independent reviewers (Editor-in-Chief + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise.
  • Dynamic Reviewer Personas: Reviewers are dynamically configured based on the paper's field and methodology type.
  • Review Modes: Supports full review, re-review, quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes.
  • Use Case: Imagine you have a new paper you want to review. Use this Skill to automatically generate a comprehensive review from a team of simulated reviewers, covering various aspects such as methodology, domain expertise, and core argument challenges.

Quick Start

Review this paper: [paste paper or provide file].

Frequently Asked Questions about academic-paper-reviewer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate peer review for an academic paper?

You can automate academic paper review by pasting the manuscript into the Skill, which simulates 5 independent expert reviewers to provide comprehensive, multi-perspective feedback on methodology and domain expertise.

Can I focus an academic paper review specifically on methodology?

Yes, you can use the methodology focus mode to specifically evaluate the research methods, or select quick assessment, full review, re-review, Socratic guided, and calibration modes for different editorial decision-making needs.

How are reviewer personas generated for different research fields?

Reviewer personas are dynamically configured based on the paper's specific field and methodology type, ensuring the simulated Editor-in-Chief, peer reviewers, and Devil's Advocate provide relevant domain expertise.

What do I need to run automated manuscript review scripts?

You need a Python environment configured on your system to run the reviewer configuration and analysis scripts required for executing the simulated peer review workflows.

What is a Socratic guided review for academic research?

A Socratic guided review is a simulated peer review mode that uses probing questions to challenge the paper's core arguments and methodology, helping researchers critically evaluate their manuscript before submission.

When should I use calibration mode for peer review simulation?

Use calibration mode during editorial decision-making to align the simulated reviewer personas' feedback with specific academic research standards and expected evaluation criteria before processing a full manuscript.