What problem does it solve? Authors submitting to journals rarely get realistic pre-submission feedback on methodology, domain contribution, and argument weaknesses. This Skill simulates a complete journal peer review process so authors can identify and fix problems before real submission. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Multi-Perspective Review Panel: Runs five role-separated reviewer seats (Journal-Fit Reviewer, methodology, domain, cross-disciplinary perspective, and a Devil's Advocate) plus an editorial synthesizer that produces an Editorial Decision Letter and Revision Roadmap. - Six Operational Modes: full review, re-review (verification of revisions), quick assessment, methodology-focus, Socratic guided review, and calibration mode for measuring reviewer accuracy against gold-standard papers. - Use Case: Paste a draft manuscript before journal submission; the Skill detects the paper's field, configures field-specific reviewer personas, and returns five review reports plus an Accept/Minor/Major/Reject decision with a structured revision roadmap. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to review this paper and paste your manuscript text or attach the file to receive a full multi-reviewer report and editorial decision.