scholarpeer-econ

To simulate peer review before journal submission, load your manuscript file and select specialized reviewer personas to run parallel independent evaluations, generating a timestamped consensus report with dimension scores and an accept, revise, or reject recommendation.

Evaluating finance and econometrics research quality involves scoring dimensions like identification, data quality, robustness, contribution, and clarity, while detecting reviewer disagreements to synthesize a structured consensus critique.

Yes, you can calibrate manuscript evaluation criteria to a specific finance journal target by optionally loading journal profiles that weight the review rubric according to common expectations for publications like JF.

Pre-submission peer review simulation supports empirical, theoretical, experimental, and survey papers, applying finance-specific scoring rubrics across independent evaluations to produce actionable quality feedback.

During manuscript quality assessment, meaningful score disagreements between reviewer personas are detected and synthesized through a script, resolving differences into a single consensus report with major and minor issues.

You need to load your manuscript from a specified file path, such as a LaTeX file, to run the finance peer review simulation and write the resulting consensus report to a designated reviews directory.