acquisition-evaluator

Score AI-generated business outputs and produce Markdown audit reports.

2|Updated Mar 31, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Wike-CHI/acquisition-agent --skill acquisition-evaluator
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: acquisition-evaluator
Source: https://github.com/Wike-CHI/acquisition-agent/tree/main/skills/acquisition-evaluator
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Wike-CHI/acquisition-agent --skill acquisition-evaluator

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

acquisition-evaluator provides an independent, standards-driven acceptance layer that verifies and scores other agents' outputs so that low-quality or unsafe deliverables are caught before they reach customers or downstream processes.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured scoring across asset types: Applies weighted checks and pass/fail veto rules to due-diligence reports, cold emails, WhatsApp messages, and commercial quotations.
  • Strict quality gates: Detects missing mandatory fields (e.g., contact info, cost leak) and enforces one-vote-fail rules to prevent risky releases.
  • Actionable audit reports: Produces a Markdown-formatted acceptance report with per-dimension scores, issues, and remediation steps for Generators to act on.
  • Integration scenarios: Used by acquisition-coordinator post-stage checkpoints, pre-send email reviews, manual QA requests, and automated pipeline quality control.

Quick Start

Evaluate the provided cold email draft for personalization, grammar, CTA clarity, and return a scored Markdown audit with remediation suggestions.

Frequently Asked Questions about acquisition-evaluator

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate quality assurance scoring for AI-generated cold emails before sending?

Automated quality assurance for AI-generated cold emails applies weighted scoring across personalization, grammar, and CTA clarity. It acts as an independent acceptance layer, returning a Markdown-formatted audit report with actionable remediation steps to fix draft issues before release.

What is agent output evaluation and how does it prevent low-quality deliverables?

Agent output evaluation is an independent, standards-driven acceptance layer that scores AI-generated business outputs. By applying weighted checks and mandatory fail conditions, it catches low-quality or unsafe deliverables in validation workflows before they reach customers or downstream processes.

How do I enforce mandatory quality gates and one-vote-fail rules for commercial quotations?

Enforcing mandatory quality gates for commercial quotations involves applying one-vote-fail rules to detect missing fields or cost leaks. The evaluator reviews generator outputs against strict pass/fail veto conditions, ensuring risky releases are blocked and flagged for remediation.

Can I use automated quality control to audit due-diligence reports and WhatsApp messages?

Automated quality control can audit due-diligence reports and WhatsApp messages through structured scoring across asset types. It evaluates content against specific weighted dimensions and produces an acceptance report detailing issues and remediation steps for manual QA or pipeline checkpoints.

What is the best way to integrate a post-stage evaluation checkpoint in an AI generation pipeline?

The best way to integrate a post-stage evaluation checkpoint is using a coordinator-triggered validation workflow. A separate evaluator reviews generator outputs, applies dimension-specific scoring, and returns a Markdown audit report to trigger automated quality control before downstream processing.

Why does my AI quotation generator fail the acceptance audit despite having all fields?

A quotation generator fails the acceptance audit when outputs violate weighted dimension thresholds or trigger mandatory fail conditions. The evaluator applies strict one-vote-fail rules to detect subtle cost leaks or compliance issues, blocking the deliverable and requiring remediation before approval.