act-consent-phase

To record participant positions during governance consent rounds, supply a proposal and its advice log to run up to three integration cycles, capturing each person's consent, stand-aside, or objection into a standardized consent record.

Structured consent decision-making handles unresolved objections by escalating them through iterative integration rounds, sequencing across affected circles to resolve concerns before finalizing the governance consent record.

Yes, you need a completed advice log along with the proposal and participant list as required inputs before initiating consent or consensus rounds to enforce proper sequencing and quorum rules.

Yes, you can apply per-circle quorum rules across various circles and ETHOS during consent decision-making, ensuring the structured rounds respect the specific governance boundaries of each affected party.

The best way to formalize governance decisions and prevent unrecorded objections is by orchestrating structured consent rounds that capture every position and generate a traceable consent record artifact for compliance.

A limitation of running integration rounds for governance proposals is that the process is capped at three cycles, meaning unresolved objections after the third round may require escalation outside the current consent workflow.