admet-predictor

Predict ADMET liabilities and assign A/B/C/D/F verdicts from physicochemical CSV data.

4|1|Updated Jan 8, 2024
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/OpenSourcePharmaFoundation/ospf-ayurveda-kg --skill admet-predictor
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: admet-predictor
Source: https://github.com/OpenSourcePharmaFoundation/ospf-ayurveda-kg/tree/main/.claude/skills/admet-predictor
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/OpenSourcePharmaFoundation/ospf-ayurveda-kg --skill admet-predictor

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

The ADMET predictor prevents promising compounds from failing late by estimating absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity risks from structure-derived physicochemical properties.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • ADMET-focused go/no-go verdicts: Produces A/B/C/D/F classifications to advance or reject candidates based on rule-of-thumb thresholds and structural alert logic.
  • Absorption and delivery feasibility checks: Assesses oral-like versus topical/mucosal feasibility with OM-specific considerations (PSA/LogP, mucoadhesion, and inflamed-tissue context).
  • Cancer-patient DDI risk framing: Flags plausible CYP interaction liabilities using the project’s mechanism/target CSVs and typical chemo regimens as context.
  • Plant compound fairness: Avoids blindly rejecting natural products with poor oral Ro5 metrics by emphasizing delivery-route alternatives for OM.

Quick Start

Use the admet-predictor skill to evaluate a candidate compound’s ADMET profile and receive a ranked verdict plus recommended delivery de-risking actions.

Frequently Asked Questions about admet-predictor

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I predict ADMET liabilities for drug repurposing candidates?

Predict ADMET liabilities by processing project CSV files containing physicochemical columns like molecular_weight, alogp, hba, hbd, and psa. The tool applies rule-based tiering and structural alerts to generate go/no-go classifications for candidate compounds.

What is the best way to screen natural products for oral mucositis treatment?

Screen natural products for oral mucositis by evaluating phytochemical absorption and delivery feasibility. The method avoids blindly rejecting plant-derived compounds with poor oral Ro5 metrics by emphasizing topical or mucosal delivery route alternatives.

How does CYP450 interaction risk framing work for cancer patients?

CYP450 interaction risk framing flags plausible drug-drug interactions by cross-referencing the project's mechanism and target CSVs against typical chemotherapy regimens. This identifies candidate compounds with potential CYP liabilities in cancer patient populations.

Can I assess oral versus topical delivery feasibility using physicochemical properties?

Assess oral versus topical delivery feasibility by analyzing PSA, LogP, and mucoadhesion properties within the inflamed-tissue context. The evaluation checks physicochemical thresholds to determine if a compound suits oral-like or mucosal delivery routes.

What ADMET classification system does this toxicity screening use?

The toxicity screening uses an A/B/C/D/F classification system to advance or reject candidates based on rule-of-thumb thresholds and structural alert logic. This tiering framework directly supports go/no-go decisions for candidate compounds.

When should I not rely on rule-of-five violations for natural product screening?

Avoid relying solely on rule-of-five violations for natural products with poor oral Ro5 metrics when alternative delivery routes exist. The approach emphasizes delivery-route alternatives for oral mucositis applications rather than rejecting compounds outright.