What problem does it solve? Standard QA finds bugs but misses friction — a technically correct app can still be unusable for real humans. This Skill roleplays a worst-case, non-technical user to surface confusing terminology, excessive clicks, missing onboarding, accessibility issues, and cold-start problems, then filters the complaints to separate real UX bugs from persona noise. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Persona-Based Testing: Generate or adopt a specific hostile persona (age, tech comfort, core task) and browse the app fully in character, attempting their actual tasks rather than a feature tour. - In-Character Feedback Report: Write a visceral rant in the persona's voice covering the good, the bad, and showstoppers, with screenshots of every pain point. - Pragmatism Filter: A mandatory triage step that classifies each complaint as RED (real UX bug), YELLOW (low priority), WHITE (persona noise), or GREEN (feature request), creating tickets only for actionable items. - Use Case: Before a product launch, run an adversarial UX test on your staging site as a 58-year-old coach who only uses WhatsApp, then receive a filtered list of at most 10 tickets tagged "ux-review" with verbatim quotes and suggested fixes. ## Quick Start Run an adversarial UX test on my staging site as a grumpy non-technical user and create tickets for the real UX issues found.