agent-work-reviewer-maintainer

You can review agent work by structuring an evidence packet around target identification, user intent, and object modeling to determine if the correct product problem was solved. This approach prioritizes real-scenario Browser verification over trusting diffs alone to validate UI behavior and workflow changes.

Evaluating agent PRs and Codex sessions requires separating explicit validation from inference and demanding scenario-first proof. By inspecting browser states, commits, and diffs, you can produce an evidence-backed accept, conditional accept, reject, or needs more evidence verdict early in the review cycle.

Yes, you can maintain read-only safety by default when inspecting agent releases and packaging paths. Reviewer mode keeps the process non-destructive, only allowing implementation or code changes when explicitly requested during the product validation and release verification workflow.

Agent work review supports release and packaging paths including Desktop and npm/GitHub surfaces. It evaluates completed or in-progress agent work across UI screenshots, browser states, branches, and commits to ensure complete behavior and a clean handoff for these specific distribution platforms.

To start an agent work review, provide the Codex session ID, run or PR link, and the product problem you expected it to solve. Requesting a verdict with named evidence gaps initiates the evaluation of object modeling, behavior, and validation status.

Agent work review prioritizes Browser and Computer Use evidence because real-scenario verification proves functional and UI workflow behavior more credibly than diffs alone. This scenario-first proof prevents false confidence in object modeling and validation when reviewing agent runs and transcripts.