agentic-eval

Evaluate and refine AI agent outputs through structured self-critique loops.

1|Updated Jan 30, 2023
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/ncksol/ravebot --skill agentic-eval-ncksol
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: agentic-eval
Source: https://github.com/ncksol/ravebot/tree/main/.github/skills/agentic-eval
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ncksol/ravebot --skill agentic-eval-ncksol

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Agents often produce outputs that require rigorous quality control to ensure reliability, consistency, and alignment with goals. This skill provides systematic evaluation and refinement workflows to improve accuracy and trustworthiness across AI tasks.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Self-critique and critique-based refinement loops to address errors and improve outputs.
  • Separate generation and evaluation components with clear interfaces for maintainability.
  • Rubric-based scoring and LLM-as-judge methods to prioritize quality in high-stakes tasks like code, reports, and analyses.
  • Use cases include code generation, decision-support, content generation, and research workflows.

Quick Start

Run a basic evaluation loop on a sample task to generate and refine the output.

Frequently Asked Questions about agentic-eval

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I improve AI output reliability using self-critique and refinement loops?

LLM-as-judge evaluates AI agent outputs by applying rubric-based scoring within structured evaluation loops. It generates JSON feedback to critique and refine high-stakes tasks like code generation, ensuring outputs align with predefined quality criteria and reliability goals.

What's the best way to set up iterative evaluation for code generation tasks?

Iterative evaluation for code generation is set up by running structured self-critique loops that evaluate outputs against a rubric and provide JSON feedback. The workflow separates generation and evaluation interfaces, applying guardrails to ensure safe convergence toward high-reliability code.

Can I use rubric-based scoring for decision support and research workflows?

You do not need external dependencies to run iterative evaluation loops, as this skill operates independently. It provides built-in guardrails for convergence and safety, allowing you to apply self-critique workflows to AI tasks without requiring additional libraries or frameworks.

Why does my AI agent output lack consistency for high-stakes content generation?

AI agent output lacks consistency when generation and evaluation are not separated into distinct components. Implementing structured self-critique loops with rubric-based scoring addresses this by iteratively refining outputs against strict criteria, ensuring alignment with reliability and consistency goals.