agentic-security-review

Validate security-scanner evidence and produce Pass, Block, or Incomplete release decisions.

Updated Jul 29, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/1stIndeXR/agentic-security-review-skill --skill agentic-security-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: agentic-security-review
Source: https://github.com/1stIndeXR/agentic-security-review-skill/tree/main
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/1stIndeXR/agentic-security-review-skill --skill agentic-security-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps you assess security-scanner evidence, review agentic systems for instruction and capability risks, and make read-only release-gate decisions when security is the explicit concern.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Evidence validation: Confirms whether scanner results actually match the intended revision, scope, configuration, and coverage.
  • Agentic security review: Reviews AI agents, skills, plugins, MCP servers, tools, hooks, retrieval, memory, delegation, and prompt-injection paths.
  • Release governance: Produces Pass, Block, or Incomplete decisions for security-sensitive launches, with a clear source-only fallback when scanner evidence is unavailable.
  • Use case: Use it when a scan exists and you need to verify its meaning, or when an MCP server or agent workflow needs a security-focused review before release.

Quick Start

Ask for a read-only security review of the supplied scanner evidence, source code, or agentic system and specify whether you want evidence overlay, source-only fallback, or a release-gate assessment.

Frequently Asked Questions about agentic-security-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I validate security scanner evidence for an AI agent release gate?

To validate security scanner evidence for an agentic release gate, confirm that scanner results match the intended revision, scope, configuration, and coverage before producing a fail-closed Pass, Block, or Incomplete decision.

How do I review MCP servers and AI plugins for prompt injection risks?

Reviewing MCP servers and AI plugins for prompt injection risks involves a read-only assessment of source code, trust boundaries, and delegation paths to identify instruction and capability vulnerabilities before release.

What is a fail-closed security review for agentic systems?

A fail-closed security review for agentic systems is a release-governance assessment that produces a Block or Incomplete decision when scanner evidence is unavailable or insufficient, defaulting to a source-only fallback rather than approving.

Can I use a security review tool for MCP servers without existing scanner artifacts?

Yes, you can perform a security review for MCP servers without scanner artifacts by requesting a source-only fallback review that analyzes source code and trust boundaries directly to produce a release-gate decision.

What are the limitations of a source-only fallback security review for AI agents?

A limitation of a source-only fallback security review for AI agents is that without scanner evidence, the read-only source and trust boundary analysis may miss runtime vulnerabilities, resulting in an Incomplete release-gate decision.