ai-evaluation

Benchmark and validate AI models across accuracy, safety, cost, and latency.

3|Updated Mar 5, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/bipinks/ghost-office --skill ai-evaluation-bipinks
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ai-evaluation
Source: https://github.com/bipinks/ghost-office/tree/main/.claude/skills/ai-evaluation
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/bipinks/ghost-office --skill ai-evaluation-bipinks

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Evaluating AI/LLM systems across accuracy, safety, cost, and latency to ensure trustworthy performance and actionable insights.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automated evaluation dimensions (accuracy, relevance, safety, latency) and rubric-based scoring.
  • Automated pipelines that run eval cases, apply rubrics, and compare models.
  • Bias detection, red-teaming, and safety evaluation integrated with model monitoring and reporting.

Quick Start

Run the evaluation suite on your LLM deployment to measure accuracy, safety, latency, and cost.

Frequently Asked Questions about ai-evaluation

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I build an automated evaluation pipeline for LLM models?

Automated evaluation pipelines run eval cases against LLM deployments, apply rubric-based scoring for accuracy and safety, and compare model outputs. You construct eval datasets, trigger red-teaming, and capture latency or cost metrics across runs.

What is LLM-as-judge scoring and how does it work for AI evaluation?

LLM-as-judge scoring uses a language model to automatically grade another model's outputs against defined rubrics. It evaluates dimensions like accuracy, relevance, and safety without requiring manual human review for every eval case.

How do I detect bias and hallucinations in my AI system?

Bias detection and hallucination checks are integrated into the evaluation suite. You run automated red-teaming and safety evaluations to identify biased outputs and factual hallucinations, ensuring trustworthy AI performance before deployment.

Can I run A/B tests to compare different LLMs for cost and latency?

Yes, you can run A/B tests to compare different LLMs across accuracy, safety, cost, and latency. The evaluation pipelines apply standardized rubrics to eval cases, generating actionable insights to benchmark and validate models.

How do I set up production monitoring hooks for ongoing AI safety?

Production monitoring hooks integrate with model monitoring and reporting to track AI safety and performance continuously. You apply automated evaluation dimensions and bias checks to live deployments, ensuring ongoing trusted performance.

When do I need to run an AI safety benchmark and red-teaming suite?

You need to run an AI safety benchmark and red-teaming suite when evaluating LLMs before deployment or during ongoing production monitoring. It validates accuracy, detects biases, and prevents hallucinations to ensure trustworthy performance.