aif-review

Review staged git changes, pull requests, and commit ranges for bugs and security issues.

Updated May 16, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/vulikjulik/DeepLom --skill aif-review-vulikjulik
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: aif-review
Source: https://github.com/vulikjulik/DeepLom/tree/main/.opencode/skills/aif-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/vulikjulik/DeepLom --skill aif-review-vulikjulik

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill eliminates the tedious and error-prone process of manually reviewing code changes, pull requests, and commit histories, ensuring consistent code quality, security, and adherence to project standards without missing critical issues.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Multi-mode review support: Review staged local changes, GitHub pull requests by number or URL, and commit ranges against any git reference.
  • Context-aware validation: Integrates with project-specific architecture rules, coding conventions, and roadmap milestones to catch boundary violations and misaligned changes.
  • Use case: A developer can use this Skill to automatically audit their uncommitted staged changes before pushing to a remote branch, or review an open PR for security vulnerabilities and performance bottlenecks before merging.

Quick Start

Ask the AI to review your staged code changes for bugs, security flaws, and adherence to your project's coding standards.

Frequently Asked Questions about aif-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code reviews for GitHub pull requests?

Automate code reviews for GitHub pull requests by passing the PR number or URL to identify bugs, security vulnerabilities, and performance issues. The review uses the GitHub CLI to access PR data and evaluate changes against project-specific coding conventions.

Can I check staged local changes for bugs before committing?

Yes, you can check staged local changes for bugs before committing by running an automated pre-commit validation. This process retrieves local git diffs to detect deviations from coding best practices and security flaws prior to pushing to a remote branch.

How do I audit a commit history range against coding best practices?

Audit a commit history range against coding best practices by specifying a commit range relative to any git reference. This evaluates commit quality, checks for boundary violations, and ensures architectural rules are consistently enforced across the history.

Does automated code review work with project-specific architecture rules?

Yes, automated code review works with project-specific architecture rules by integrating with project context artifacts. This allows the review process to catch boundary violations and flag changes that misalign with your team's established roadmap milestones and coding conventions.

What is the best way to find security vulnerabilities in a pull request?

The best way to find security vulnerabilities in a pull request is through automated security checks integrated into your workflow. This evaluates the PR diff for security flaws and performance bottlenecks before merging, ensuring consistent code quality without manual inspection.

Do I need the GitHub CLI to perform a pull request audit?

Yes, you need the GitHub CLI to perform a pull request audit because the review process integrates with it to access PR data. Local staged change reviews and commit range checks solely require git for retrieving diffs.