alfworld-search-verifier

Revisit previously visited receptacles to verify the presence or absence of target objects.

145|1|Updated Mar 16, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/taomiao/DynamicSkillCompiler --skill alfworld-search-verifier-taomiao
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: alfworld-search-verifier
Source: https://github.com/taomiao/DynamicSkillCompiler/tree/main/experiments/src/skills/alfworld/alfworld-search-verifier
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/taomiao/DynamicSkillCompiler --skill alfworld-search-verifier-taomiao

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill enables an agent to re-examine previously visited locations to verify the absence or presence of a target object, reducing missed items during searches.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Revisit and verify locations: Methodically return to each visited receptacle to re-check its contents for overlooked objects.
  • Closed receptacle handling: Re-open previously closed containers to ensure no items are missed.
  • Target object confirmation: Identify and retrieve specific objects if found during revisits, or conclusively determine their absence.

Quick Start

Use the verifier skill to systematically revisit the listed receptacles and verify whether the target item exists or not.

Frequently Asked Questions about alfworld-search-verifier

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I verify object absence in visited locations during a search?

Verifying object absence requires systematically revisiting previously checked locations and re-examining receptacles to confirm whether a target object is truly missing, reducing the chance of missed detections during navigation.

Why does my agent miss items when searching closed receptacles in an environment?

Missing items occurs when closed receptacles are not re-opened during a search. Re-examining visited locations by navigating back and opening previously closed containers ensures no overlooked objects remain undetected.

What is the best way to re-check visited locations for a target object?

The best way to re-check visited locations is methodically returning to each receptacle, parsing current observations, and applying conditional logic to conclusively determine the target object's presence or absence.

Can I use this approach to confirm an object is missing in home or office environments?

Yes, confirming a missing object works in environments like homes or offices by navigating back to visited receptacles, opening containers, and observing contents to reliably check for the specific item.

How do I stop my search agent from reporting false negatives during navigation?

To stop false negatives, systematically revisit listed receptacles and re-open closed containers to verify whether the target item exists, ensuring accurate presence or absence confirmation before concluding the search.

Does reliable checking require environment navigation actions to revisit receptacles?

Yes, reliable checking requires environment navigation actions to return to visited receptacles, parse new observations upon opening them, and apply conditional logic to confirm item presence or absence.