What problem does it solve?
This Skill enables editors and researchers to simulate comprehensive, phase-based peer reviews of scholarly manuscripts using a standardized, multi-agent workflow (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate), producing structured feedback and a clear revision roadmap.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Phase-driven reviewer configuration: automatically assembles five distinct reviewer personas (EIC, Methodology, Domain, Perspective, Devil's Advocate) and presents configurable identities.
- Parallel Phase 1 reviews: each reviewer produces independent reports without cross-talk, ensuring diverse critique.
- Editorial synthesis: consolidates reports, identifies consensus/disagreements, and generates an Editorial Decision plus a prioritized Revision Roadmap.
- Re-review support: verifies revision quality against the ROADMAP and outputs residual issues and updated decision.
- Output formats: standardized templates for reviewer reports, revision responses, and decision letters.
Quick Start
Provide a manuscript and specify any domain constraints; the system will run Phase 0 field analysis, Phase 1 parallel reviews by 5 agents, Phase 2 editorial synthesis, and return a full revision roadmap.