alterlab-scholar-eval

Assess scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework with weighted scoring.

58|9|Updated Mar 16, 2026

Search Tags:#rubrics #academic-writing #scholar-eval #dimensions #report-generation #research-evaluation

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/AlterLab-IEU/AlterLab-Academic-Skills --skill alterlab-scholar-eval

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: alterlab-scholar-eval
Source: https://github.com/AlterLab-IEU/AlterLab-Academic-Skills/tree/main/skills/writing-tools/alterlab-scholar-eval
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/AlterLab-IEU/AlterLab-Academic-Skills --skill alterlab-scholar-eval

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Provides a rigorous, rubric-based framework to evaluate scholarly work across multiple dimensions, delivering transparent scoring and structured feedback to guide revisions and publication decisions.

Core Features & Use Cases

Dimension-based evaluation across eight core areas (problem formulation, literature review, methodology, data collection, analysis, results, writing, and citations) with a weighted scoring model.
Automated score reporting and visualizations to summarize strengths and areas for improvement.
Workflow integration with the ScholarEval references to reuse criteria and guidelines for papers, proposals, literature reviews, theses, and conference abstracts.

Quick Start

Run the ScholarEval workflow on your manuscript to generate a rubric-based evaluation and a structured report.

Frequently Asked Questions about alterlab-scholar-eval

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I evaluate academic writing using a structured rubric?▼

You can evaluate academic writing using a structured rubric by applying the ScholarEval framework to score manuscripts across eight dimensions, generating weighted scores and detailed reports for revisions and publication decisions.

What is the best way to generate a structured research evaluation report?▼

The best way to generate a structured research evaluation report is using the ScholarEval workflow, which calculates weighted scores across core dimensions like methodology and analysis, then outputs visualizations and feedback for scholarly work.

Can I use rubrics to assess conference abstracts and literature reviews?▼

Yes, you can use rubrics to assess conference abstracts and literature reviews. The framework evaluates multiple scholarly formats, applying dimension-based criteria to deliver transparent scoring and structured feedback for each document type.

How does weighted scoring work for research paper evaluation?▼

Weighted scoring for research paper evaluation works by calculating scores across eight core areas including problem formulation, methodology, and citations. The calculation tool processes these dimensions to produce a final overall rating and structured feedback.

Does scholarly evaluation require accessing an external framework file?▼

Yes, scholarly evaluation requires accessing the evaluation framework file stored in the references directory. The Skill uses this framework alongside a score calculation script to apply rubric criteria and generate the final assessment report.

What dimensions are covered in rubric-based scholarly evaluation?▼

Rubric-based scholarly evaluation covers eight dimensions: problem formulation, literature review, methodology, data collection, analysis, results, writing, and citations. Each area receives weighted scores to identify strengths and areas for improvement.