skills.rest
Felpix-Studios
Felpix-StudiosCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
𝕏@felpix_GitHub

revise-paper

Extract and prioritize reviewer feedback for section-by-section manuscript revisions.

8|2|Updated Apr 2, 2026
Search Tags:#manuscript#proofreading#peer-review#quality-reports#revise#revision-plan
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Felpix-Studios/social-science-research --skill revise-paper
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: revise-paper
Source: https://github.com/Felpix-Studios/social-science-research/tree/main/skills/revise-paper
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Felpix-Studios/social-science-research --skill revise-paper

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Systematically apply reviewer feedback to manuscripts by extracting actionable items from a review report, prioritizing them, and applying fixes with user approval to preserve author voice.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Prioritized revision planning based on reviewer comments.
  • Section-by-section edits with user-approved changes, preserving manuscript style.
  • Works across peer-review cycles and pre-submission revisions by coordinating with quality reports and manuscripts.

Quick Start

Provide the path to a review report (or leave blank to auto-detect) and confirm which revisions to apply.

Frequently Asked Questions about revise-paper

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I apply reviewer feedback to a manuscript systematically?▼

To apply reviewer feedback to a manuscript, extract actionable items from the review report, prioritize them, and execute section-by-section edits that require user approval before any changes are made.

Can I use this to revise a manuscript for a pre-submission check?▼

Yes, you can revise a manuscript for pre-submission checks. The tool coordinates revision cycles across academic domains by aligning your manuscript text with quality reports and reviewer comments.

What is the best way to preserve author voice during peer-review revisions?▼

The best way to preserve author voice during peer-review revisions is to enforce user approval before applying any edits, ensuring section-by-section changes match the original manuscript style.

How do I prioritize reviewer comments for a revision plan?▼

You can prioritize reviewer comments for a revision plan by automatically extracting actionable items from the review report and sorting them by importance before applying fixes to the manuscript.

Do I need accessible review reports to start the manuscript revision process?▼

Yes, you need accessible review reports and manuscript files to start the revision process, or you can leave the report path blank for the system to auto-detect available feedback documents.

Related Skills

Explore More Education & Research Skills→
CRDong233CRDong233
3

academic-paper-reviewer

Generate five reviewer reports and an editorial decision with revision roadmap.

Community
Advanced
u9401066u9401066
11

manuscript-review

Detect methodological, statistical, ethical, and reporting-guideline issues in medical manuscript drafts.

Community
Advanced
bionoob7bionoob7
37

lit-draft

Draft literature review sections from outlines and extracted notes.

Community
Advanced
icerain-cmdicerain-cmd
15

responding-to-peer-review

Organize reviewer comments into traceable revision records and response drafts.

Community
Advanced