skills.rest
Agent-Engineer-Master
Agent-Engineer-MasterOFFICIAL
Explore all skills by this author →
𝕏@agentengmasterGitHub

analysis-quality-review

Evaluate analytical documents with two-pass structure and readability reviews.

7|1|Updated Apr 7, 2026
Search Tags:#readability#analysis#structure#review#rubric
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Agent-Engineer-Master/skill-engineer --skill analysis-quality-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: analysis-quality-review
Source: https://github.com/Agent-Engineer-Master/skill-engineer/tree/main/operations/analysis-quality-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Agent-Engineer-Master/skill-engineer --skill analysis-quality-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a structured, read-only review protocol that ensures analytical documents (briefs, decks, memos, ADRs, wiki pages, and daily notes) adhere to a consistent quality standard. It orchestrates a ghost-deck workflow that validates one document at a time using a two-pass process (structure review and readability review), returning a detailed violation report and a path to canonical fix patterns for safe edits by the calling skill.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Two-mode orchestration: spec (template retrieval), spec-judge (validation of the filled-in spec), and review (two gating passes on the final document).
  • Pre-flight artifact loading via artifact-loader to build a load_bearing_index.yaml for traceable, cross-document references.
  • Fresh-context reviewer agents: argument-structure-reviewer and readability-reviewer that grade against framework-specific rubrics.
  • Output artifacts: a violation report, a summary, and a reference to references/fix-patterns.md for canonical edits.
  • End-to-end use: from spec creation to final HTML/prose delivery with gated checks to reduce post-hoc rework.

Quick Start

Execute on a prepared spec or document to generate a violation report and a path to canonical fix patterns for safe edits.

Frequently Asked Questions about analysis-quality-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review an analytical document for structure and readability violations?▼

To review an analytical document for structure and readability violations, you can use a two-pass evaluation process that grades against framework-specific rubrics, returning a structured violation report and a path to canonical fix patterns.

What is the best way to enforce consistent quality standards across analytical briefs and memos?▼

Enforcing consistent quality standards across analytical briefs and memos requires a read-only review protocol that validates documents using gated checks, reducing post-hoc rework by surfacing structural and readability issues before final delivery.

How does a two-pass readability and structure review process work?▼

A two-pass readability and structure review works by deploying fresh-context reviewer agents to sequentially grade argument structure and readability, generating a detailed violation report that guides safe edits via canonical fix patterns.

What types of analytical documents can be checked using a rubric-based review protocol?▼

A rubric-based review protocol can check various reader-facing analytical documents, including briefs, decks, memos, architecture decision records, wiki pages, and daily notes.

When should I use a spec-judge mode for document validation?▼

You should use a spec-judge mode for document validation when you need to validate a filled-in specification template before proceeding to the final review, ensuring the document meets framework requirements before generating a violation report.

Related Skills

Explore More Data & Analytics Skills→
Agent-Engineer-MasterAgent-Engineer-Master
7

write-report

Pre-flight reader-facing analytics by grading structure and readability across spec, spec-judge, and review modes.

Official
Advanced
davidbeglenboyledavidbeglenboyle
2

review-loop

Run a six-step quality-check loop over session deliverables.

Community
Advanced
AndrewChang-cpuAndrewChang-cpu

subagent-driven-development

Dispatch fresh subagents for each task with spec and code quality reviews.

Community
Advanced
TheBushidoCollectiveTheBushidoCollective
187

technical-planning

Generate implementation plans with tasks, dependencies, and success criteria.

Official
Intermediate