analyze-results

Compute statistics and generate comparison tables from ML experiment results.

2|Updated Mar 29, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/satsuki-64/MiniAgentWorkflow --skill analyze-results-satsuki-64
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: analyze-results
Source: https://github.com/satsuki-64/MiniAgentWorkflow/tree/main/.skills/analyze-results
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/satsuki-64/MiniAgentWorkflow --skill analyze-results-satsuki-64

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Analyze ML experiment results to compute statistics and generate structured comparison insights.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automated statistical analysis across models, hyperparameters, and data configurations
  • Generation of comparison tables and reproducibility checks
  • Insightful reporting to guide interpretation and future experiments

Quick Start

Load results and run an end-to-end evaluation to generate a concise insights report.

Frequently Asked Questions about analyze-results

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I compare ML experiment results across multiple models and hyperparameters?

To compare ML experiment results, load your JSON or CSV outputs to compute statistics like means and standard deviations, generating structured comparison tables that identify and quantify differences across hyperparameters, data configurations, and multiple seeds.

Can I analyze experiment results from CSV and JSON files?

Yes, you can analyze experiment results from both CSV and JSON file formats. The tool parses these outputs to compute statistics and produce structured insights tables for comparing model performance across different configurations.

How do I compute statistics for ML experiments with multiple random seeds?

Computing statistics for ML experiments with multiple seeds involves aggregating results to calculate means and standard deviations. This handles seed variance and performs reproducibility checks to generate reliable comparison tables across experiment runs.

What is the best way to generate reproducibility checks for experiment results?

The best way to generate reproducibility checks for experiment results is to aggregate data across multiple seeds and configurations, computing statistical variance to produce structured insights tables that quantify differences and validate model performance consistency.

Does this tool work for comparing data configurations in ML evaluation?

Yes, this tool works for comparing data configurations in ML evaluation by parsing experiment outputs to compute comparative statistics. It identifies performance differences across varying data setups and generates structured tables to guide future experiments.