What problem does it solve? Memory draft candidates in the session-distill review chain are often plausible but lack concrete supporting evidence from code, docs, config, tests, or command output. This Skill fills those evidence gaps so reviewers can make informed decisions without blocking the main distillation chain. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Evidence Gathering: Uses Read, Grep, and Glob to locate supporting files, commands, or docs for a draft claim. - Structured Evidence Answers: Returns a compact answer with direct findings, supporting references, uncertainty notes, and a suggested classification (new, refine, confirm, conflict, or ephemeral). - Non-Blocking Design: Operates as an optional collaborator outside the default session-distill main chain and never approves, rejects, or syncs memory entries. - Use Case: A review note flags a candidate claiming a repo behavior but cites no file. Invoke this Skill to locate the relevant source file and command output, then return the evidence so the reviewer can confirm or reject the candidate. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to use answer-me to find code and documentation evidence supporting this under-evidenced memory draft candidate.
