architect-reviewer

Analyze and validate high-level system designs and architectural patterns.

1|Updated Apr 8, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/united-software-platform/req-control --skill architect-reviewer-united-software-platform
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: architect-reviewer
Source: https://github.com/united-software-platform/req-control/tree/main/.claude/skills/architect-reviewer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/united-software-platform/req-control --skill architect-reviewer-united-software-platform

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps teams evaluate high-level architectural decisions, patterns, and technology choices to ensure scalable, maintainable systems.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Architectural pattern evaluation across system boundaries (monolith, microservices, hexagonal, DDD)
  • Technology justification and tooling choices for long-term viability
  • Roadmap recommendations and risk assessment for architectural decisions

Quick Start

Provide a comprehensive architectural review by outlining the system context and requested outcomes, then generate actionable recommendations.

Frequently Asked Questions about architect-reviewer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I conduct an architecture review for a large-scale system?

An architecture review for large-scale systems analyzes high-level designs, evaluating pattern fidelity, technology justification, and risk assessment to ensure scalability and maintainability across multi-module projects.

When do I need an architectural pattern evaluation for my project?

Architectural pattern evaluation is needed when validating system boundaries across monolith, microservices, hexagonal, or DDD patterns to ensure long-term viability, maintainability, and integration potential for large-scale projects.

What is the best way to justify technology choices for scalable systems?

Justifying technology choices for scalable systems involves analyzing tooling selections against long-term viability requirements, ensuring pattern fidelity and generating roadmap recommendations for sustained architectural stability.

Can I use this to assess risks in microservices and DDD architectures?

Yes, you can assess risks in microservices and DDD architectures by evaluating architectural patterns across system boundaries, providing targeted risk assessment and actionable roadmap recommendations for multi-module environments.

How do I evaluate scalability and maintainability for multi-module projects?

Evaluating scalability and maintainability for multi-module projects requires analyzing high-level system designs and integration potential, validating that architectural decisions satisfy performance and security requirements across domains.

What context should I provide to get actionable architecture recommendations?

Provide system context and requested outcomes to generate actionable recommendations, allowing the architecture review to analyze design patterns, assess risks, and deliver targeted roadmap guidance for your specific project.