architecture-decision

To document a system architecture decision, you create a structured ADR covering context, alternatives, consequences, and validation criteria. This prevents key technical choices from being lost or inconsistently implemented across your project lifecycle.

Validating engine compatibility requires checking your technical design against engine reference materials, existing architectural stances, and dependencies. This ensures the proposed system architecture maintains strategic technical coherence and avoids engine-specific risks.

You can retrofit existing ADRs by appending missing governance sections like validation criteria and ownership decisions without modifying their established content. This updates technical governance workflows while preserving the original architectural context.

You need an ADR for GDD-driven development when making significant technical choices that require GDD traceability and architectural consistency checks. This documents the decision context and validates engine-specific risks during system design.

Yes, the architecture decision process supports technical review workflows by validating engine compatibility and consistency, then registering the resulting interface and ownership decisions in architecture registries for durable technical governance.