architecture-review

To check ADR coverage against GDDs, you need a traceability matrix that maps every technical requirement to its corresponding architecture decision record. This review process extracts requirements into a registry and generates a coverage report to surface gaps or partial implementations across your project.

Detecting cross-ADR conflicts requires consistency checks across ownership, integration contracts, performance budgets, dependencies, and state authority. An architecture review identifies contradictions between decision records to prevent architectural drift and ensure project-wide consistency before production.

Validating Godot 4 engine compatibility involves auditing ADRs against engine reference docs to verify version consistency. An architecture review flags deprecated or stale API assumptions in your decision records to ensure your technical design aligns with the engine's current capabilities.

Yes, you can generate a pre-production readiness verdict by running a full architecture review across your GDDs and ADRs. The process outputs a structured PASS, CONCERNS, or FAIL verdict report detailing coverage gaps, conflicts, and engine compatibility issues for your Godot-based system.

You need an architecture traceability matrix when your game design document contains technical requirements that must be fulfilled by architecture decisions. It ensures every requirement is addressed by an ADR, preventing architectural drift during the transition from design to pre-production.

No, engine reference docs are required alongside GDDs and ADRs to perform a complete architecture review. Loading these documents is necessary to extract technical requirements, build coverage reports, and accurately flag deprecated or stale API assumptions for engine compatibility audits.