architecture-reviewer-skill

Review architecture documents by evaluating completeness, risk quality, assumptions exposure, and standards compliance. Submit the document to generate structured findings with severity levels, suggested mitigations, and next steps.

Yes, architecture risk assessments output actionable findings that include severity levels and suggested mitigations. This provides fast, objective improvements for quality assurance directly from the submitted document's content.

Architecture reviews evaluate standards compliance by checking the explicit information present in the provided document sections. The scope is limited to stated details to avoid inferring unstated requirements during the assessment.

Identify hidden assumptions by evaluating assumption exposure during an architecture review. The review surfaces structured findings based strictly on explicit document content, highlighting unstated details and providing actionable next steps.

Automate architecture quality assurance by submitting documents for structured findings. Use orchestrated mode for automated processing or standalone mode to receive an annotated document for direct review and objective improvements.

No, architecture reviews avoid inferring unstated details. The scope is limited strictly to information explicitly present in the provided document and its sections to ensure accurate, objective findings for your design.