arxiv-researcher

Analyze arXiv papers to extract contributions, limitations, and structured literature reviews.

6|Updated May 20, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/vignesh2027/Claude-Agentic-Skills2.0-version --skill arxiv-researcher
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: arxiv-researcher
Source: https://github.com/vignesh2027/Claude-Agentic-Skills2.0-version/tree/main/arxiv-researcher
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/vignesh2027/Claude-Agentic-Skills2.0-version --skill arxiv-researcher

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Activates ArxivResearcher — a deep academic paper analysis and synthesis agent. Use when you need to understand cutting-edge research, compare approaches across multiple papers, extract key contributions and limitations, translate ML/CS/physics papers into actionable insights, build literature reviews, or track the state-of-the-art on a specific topic.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • PaperDeconstructor — Abstract → contribution → method → experiments → limitations pipeline
  • LiteratureMapper — Citation graph analysis, prior work positioning, SOTA comparison
  • MethodTranslator — Convert academic notation into pseudocode and implementation guidance
  • CriticalEvaluator — Statistical validity, reproducibility flags, baseline fairness assessment
  • SynthesisWriter — Literature review sections, research summaries, blog-post translations

Quick Start

Provide a topic and papers to analyze, and obtain a structured literature review with actionable insights.

Frequently Asked Questions about arxiv-researcher

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I build a literature review from arXiv research papers?

Build a literature review by providing arXiv papers to analyze, which extracts core contributions, maps citation graphs, and generates structured reports suitable for research summaries.

What is the best way to compare state-of-the-art approaches in machine learning papers?

Comparing state-of-the-art approaches involves extracting contributions and limitations across multiple papers, mapping prior work positioning, and generating cross-paper comparisons to highlight methodological differences.

How do I translate academic notation from physics and ML papers into pseudocode?

Translate academic notation into pseudocode by processing full texts to convert complex mathematical formulations into actionable implementation guidance and structured pseudocode outputs.

Can I assess the reproducibility and statistical validity of arXiv papers?

Assess reproducibility by evaluating statistical validity, flagging reproducibility issues, and checking baseline fairness to determine the reliability of experiments within the analyzed papers.

Does literature review synthesis work for tracking state-of-the-art advancements across multiple arXiv papers?

Literature review synthesis works for tracking state-of-the-art advancements by parsing abstracts and full texts to identify contributions, map citations, and generate structured research summaries.

What are the limitations of automated research analysis for computer science papers?

Limitations of automated research analysis include reliance on parsing full texts for accurate contribution extraction and the need for human oversight when evaluating complex methodological reproducibility flags.