py-paper

Analyze scholarly papers from arXiv URLs or PDFs into structured reports.

Updated Apr 6, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/fantay0312/fantayspec --skill py-paper
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: py-paper
Source: https://github.com/fantay0312/fantayspec/tree/main/shared/skills/skills-all/py-paper
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/fantay0312/fantayspec --skill py-paper

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Analyzing academic papers is time-consuming. This skill identifies the research gap, distills the core contribution, and presents a structured, reader-friendly critique to help researchers decide what to read next.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Gap detection: clearly states the boundary the paper claims to push.
  • Incremental contribution: summarizes what new insight the paper provides.
  • Structured reporting: delivers a concise evaluation covering gap, method, results, and implications.
  • Use Case: a researcher reviewing arXiv links, conference papers, or PDFs can obtain a quick, decision-ready assessment.

Quick Start

Provide a full, structured analysis of a paper by supplying its URL or PDF and let the system generate the report.

Frequently Asked Questions about py-paper

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I analyze an academic paper to identify the research gap and core contribution?

To analyze an academic paper, supply its arXiv URL, PDF, or local document to generate a structured report. This identifies the research gap, distills the core contribution, and delivers a reader-friendly critique covering method, results, and conclusions.

What is the best way to get a quick assessment of a scholarly paper's novelty and significance?

The best way to assess a scholarly paper's novelty is to generate a structured analysis that explicitly states the boundary the paper pushes. This produces a concise verdict evaluating the incremental contribution and significance of the research findings.

Can I use this tool to review arXiv links and conference PDFs for decision-ready evaluations?

Yes, you can review arXiv links, conference papers, and local PDFs to obtain a quick, decision-ready assessment. The system extracts the title, authors, abstract, method, results, and conclusions to help researchers decide what to read next.

How do I generate a structured report from a local PDF document?

To generate a structured report from a local PDF, provide the document to the system and let it process the content. It outputs a concise evaluation covering the research gap, method, results, implications, and a final verdict on the paper's significance.

Does analyzing academic papers with this approach work for any research domain?

Yes, analyzing academic papers with this approach works across research domains. The system identifies the gap and main contribution regardless of the specific field, delivering a structured critique to help you evaluate novelty and significance universally.

What should a paper analysis include to help me decide what to read next?

A paper analysis should include the title, authors, abstract, method, results, and conclusions, along with an assessment of novelty and significance. This structured report clearly states the research gap and incremental contribution to guide your reading priorities.