What problem does it solve? Marketers lose budget to channels that look good in one dashboard and terrible in another, because Google, Meta, GA4, and the CRM each report different conversion numbers for the same sales. This Skill helps you choose and interpret attribution models, reconcile conflicting sources, and instrument first-party attribution when you control the site or app. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Model interpretation: Compare first-touch, last-touch, linear, time-decay, position-based, and data-driven attribution, and understand how each model distorts credit for long or short sales cycles. - Source reconciliation: De-duplicate overlapping platform claims against a single source of truth (CRM or backend), read directional trends, and use self-reported surveys and incrementality tests as tiebreakers. - First-party instrumentation: Stitch anonymous browsing to conversions using identify/merge calls, metadata passthrough, and webhooks for conversions on third-party domains like SavvyCal or Stripe Checkout. - Use Case: Your Google Ads reports 50 conversions, Meta reports 40, GA4 says 60, and your CRM shows 35 deals. Use this Skill to establish the CRM as the source of truth, explain each platform's bias, and deliver an honest budget allocation with confidence levels. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to reconcile your conflicting conversion numbers across Google Ads, Meta, GA4, and your CRM and recommend which attribution model fits your sales cycle.