audience-reaction-analyzer-extras

What problem does it solve?

Traditional deliverable gap and completeness reviews often miss required elements or generate false "X is missing" claims because they rely on reviewer intuition instead of the deliverable's governing specification, and absence assertions are not verified against the full artifact.

Core Features & Use Cases

• Spec-first completeness check: Diffs the deliverable against its own outline, spec, table of contents, or template to surface all missing required elements, eliminating intuition-based oversight.
• Verified absence claims: Backs every "X is missing" assertion with a targeted search of the full artifact to distinguish real gaps, placement issues, and true omissions.
• Use Case: When reviewing a CIO investment policy document, first diff it against the required policy template to identify missing mandated sections, then verify each gap claim by searching the full document for required terms like Sharpe ratio or fee disclosures to avoid false positives.

Quick Start

Use the audience-reaction-analyzer-extras skill to perform a spec-first completeness review of the attached investment policy document and verify all identified gap claims with targeted searches.