auto-paper-improvement-loop

Automate iterative paper improvement by running an autonomous two-round workflow that reviews the compiled LaTeX manuscript, generates fixes, and rebuilds the PDF. This loop operates on your paper directory to tighten arguments and address inconsistencies.

An autonomous paper-improvement loop runs two cycles of review, fix, and recompile on a compiled academic manuscript. It enforces reviewer independence by using fresh review threads per round to avoid carryover bias and maintain objective assessment.

Start the automated academic writing review by providing a paper directory containing paper/main.tex and paper/main.pdf. The workflow then initiates the first review round, implements fixes, and recompiles the LaTeX sources automatically.

Yes, you can pause the workflow for human approval using the optional human checkpoint feature. This allows you to provide user guidance or approve changes before the automated paper-improvement loop proceeds to subsequent rounds.

Yes, the workflow persists state for recovery by logging progress to PAPER_IMPROVEMENT_LOG.md. This structured log file ensures reproducibility and allows the automated review loop to resume after interruptions.