auto-review-loop-llm

Iteratively review and refine research drafts until acceptance criteria are met.

1|Updated May 14, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/lix965996-art/MMM --skill auto-review-loop-llm-lix965996-art
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: auto-review-loop-llm
Source: https://github.com/lix965996-art/MMM/tree/main/resources/app/skills/auto-review-loop-llm
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/lix965996-art/MMM --skill auto-review-loop-llm-lix965996-art

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

It helps you iteratively refine a research draft by running a structured review-improve-review loop with an external LLM, reducing the risk of submitting work that still has major weaknesses.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Autonomous review loop: Performs repeated cycles of reviewer assessment, fix implementation, and re-review until quality passes or the maximum rounds are reached.
  • Action-driven improvements: Extracts score, verdict, and prioritized weaknesses from reviewer output, then applies the minimum necessary fixes.
  • Persistent recovery and logging: Saves compact round state to REVIEW_STATE.json and appends a cumulative, expandable review history to AUTO_REVIEW.md for continuity across runs.
  • Use Case: You have a draft with experiments and results; this Skill reviews it like a senior venue reviewer, identifies critical gaps, applies targeted changes, and rechecks readiness across up to four rounds.

Quick Start

Run auto review loop llm on your research topic to produce a score, verdict, and prioritized fix plan, then continue improving until the work is ready or MAX_ROUNDS is reached.

Frequently Asked Questions about auto-review-loop-llm

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I autonomously iterate on a research draft to meet acceptance criteria?

An autonomous review loop automates research refinement by iteratively reviewing a draft, implementing prioritized fixes, and re-reviewing until acceptance criteria are met or maximum rounds are reached.

What is venue-style scoring for research review?

Venue-style scoring evaluates research drafts like a senior venue reviewer, extracting a score, verdict, and prioritized weaknesses to apply targeted changes across multiple rounds.

Do I need an OpenAI-compatible reviewer API to run the autonomous review loop?

Yes, the autonomous review loop requires an OpenAI-compatible reviewer API via reviewer_client.py to perform automated assessment and apply actionable critiques.

How does the review loop handle recovery and continuity across runs?

The review loop persists compact round state in REVIEW_STATE.json and appends cumulative review history to AUTO_REVIEW.md, ensuring recovery and transparency across interrupted runs.

What is the maximum number of rounds for automated research improvement?

The automated research improvement loop runs for up to four rounds, applying minimum necessary fixes extracted from reviewer output until the work passes quality gates.

Can I use the review loop for ML documentation workflows?

Yes, the review loop supports both research and ML documentation workflows where quality gates require venue-style scoring and actionable critiques across multiple rounds.