autoplan

You can automate plan review pipelines by running a single command that orchestrates CEO, design, and engineering evaluations. The process reads existing review definitions from disk and applies deterministic rules to eliminate manual back-and-forth questioning.

The best way to run automated engineering and design reviews together is using a single-command pipeline that orchestrates all evaluations. It applies a six-principle rule set covering completeness, pragmatism, and bias toward action to auto-decide intermediate questions.

Yes, you can auto-execute plan reviews when a plan file is present. The pipeline supports proactive execution by reading the file and running the full review cycle on demand without requiring manual initiation for each step.

Deterministic decision logging for automated plan approvals works by applying a structured rule set to intermediate questions and logging the outcomes. This ensures consistent, traceable decisions while surfacing only final tradeoffs at a designated gate for human taste decisions.

No, you do not need manual coordination for CEO, design, and engineering reviews. The automation pipeline reads the relevant skill definitions from disk and runs them sequentially, replacing manual back-and-forth questioning with deterministic, rule-based decisions.

A limitation of using a single command for full plan review pipelines is that intermediate questions are auto-decided by deterministic rules. Complex nuance is deferred to a final gate where you must manually evaluate taste decisions and tradeoffs before final approval.