Analyze branch diffs to identify defects that tests miss.
npx skills add https://github.com/agwacom/avadbeta --skill avadbeta-review
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: avadbeta-review Source: https://github.com/agwacom/avadbeta/tree/main/codex-plugin/skills/avadbeta-review Command: npx skills add https://github.com/agwacom/avadbeta --skill avadbeta-review
Evidence-backed code review of the current branch diff against the base branch. Find defects the tests do not catch, report them as specific findings the user can act on, and stop.
Run the /avadbeta-review command on a branch with changes to generate a findings report.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
Automate pre-landing code reviews by running the review command on your current branch. It analyzes the diff against the base branch to identify defects tests miss, reporting specific actionable findings with precise lines for your PR.
Evidence-based code review evaluates changed files strictly from the branch diff. It reads new and modified files to surface defects not covered by tests, producing rationale-backed findings to guide reviewer decisions during pre-landing workflows.
Yes, you can use this for risk assessment sweeps before merging. It operates on changed files within the diff to evaluate impact and identify potential risks, generating a findings report to support your hand-offs and PR feedback workflows.
No, the code review does not fix defects automatically. It operates strictly on the diff to read changed files and reports specific actionable findings, stopping there unless you explicitly ask it to apply fixes to the identified issues.
The best way to find missed defects is executing a diff-based analysis against your base branch. It reads changed and new files to pinpoint uncovered issues, delivering precise actionable findings with rationale for your pre-landing review.
ivklgnLoad current branch diffs, commits, and changed files into session context.
nholder88Review changed code for defects and quality gaps before merging.
MinhmiceInspect code diffs for security flaws, bugs, and maintainability issues.
lucas-flatwhiteAnalyze diffs against the base branch for SQL safety and trust boundary issues.
