bgpt-paper-search

Retrieve structured full-text experimental details from scientific papers via BGPT MCP.

4|Updated Mar 2, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/shushuzn/Rairos --skill bgpt-paper-search-shushuzn
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: bgpt-paper-search
Source: https://github.com/shushuzn/Rairos/tree/main/skills/bgpt-paper-search
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/shushuzn/Rairos --skill bgpt-paper-search-shushuzn

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

It solves the problem of finding and comparing experiment-level details that abstracts often omit, so you can quickly build evidence tables grounded in full-text results.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Full-text structured extraction: Retrieves 25+ fields per paper such as methods, results, sample sizes, quality scores, and conclusions rather than only titles and abstracts.
  • Systematic review support: Helps with literature reviews and scoping studies by surfacing quantitative evidence and methodological differences across papers.
  • Evidence synthesis readiness: Produces structured outputs suitable for comparing interventions, building evidence tables, and supporting meta-analytic or guideline workflows.

Quick Start

Configure the BGPT MCP server for your Claude/OpenAI-compatible MCP client, then ask: Search for papers about "CRISPR gene editing efficiency in human cells" and return their methods, sample sizes, results, and quality scores.

Frequently Asked Questions about bgpt-paper-search

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I get full-text experimental details from papers instead of just abstracts for a systematic review?

Full-text experimental paper search retrieves structured multi-field records including methods, sample sizes, quality scores, and conclusions. This allows you to build evidence tables grounded in reported quantitative results rather than relying solely on abstract summaries.

What's the best way to compare experimental methods and sample sizes across multiple scientific papers?

Comparing experimental methods across papers requires retrieving structured full-text data fields. This Skill extracts over 25 fields per paper, including methods and sample sizes, so you can surface methodological differences and support evidence synthesis workflows.

Can I use full-text paper search to build evidence tables for a scoping review?

Full-text paper search supports literature reviews and scoping studies by producing structured outputs. These outputs contain quantitative evidence and quality scores suitable for comparing interventions and building evidence tables for meta-analytic workflows.

Do I need a specific server setup to extract full-text paper data for evidence synthesis?

Extracting full-text paper data requires access to a remote BGPT MCP server. You must configure this server for your MCP client to use the provided search_papers tool, which returns the structured multi-field records needed for evidence synthesis.

Does full-text experimental paper search provide quality scoring for systematic searches?

Full-text experimental paper search provides quality scoring as part of its structured output. It retrieves 25-plus fields per paper, including quality scores and conclusions, ensuring your systematic search captures the necessary data for guideline workflows.

What limitations exist when using full-text extraction for literature reviews?

Full-text extraction for literature reviews depends on remote server access through an MCP client. It is designed for retrieving reported experimental methods and quantitative results, meaning it focuses on structured data extraction rather than generating novel analytical interpretations.