bicameral-resolve-collision

Resolve decision collisions and context-for signals in bicameral.ingest.

Updated Aug 23, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/BicameralAI/bicameral-mcp --skill bicameral-resolve-collision
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: bicameral-resolve-collision
Source: https://github.com/BicameralAI/bicameral-mcp/tree/main/.claude/skills/bicameral-resolve-collision
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/BicameralAI/bicameral-mcp --skill bicameral-resolve-collision

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Ingest and decision-logging systems can yield overlapping decisions or pending context-for links. This Skill provides a structured workflow to resolve collisions (supersede vs keep_both) and manage context-for (confirmed vs rejected) to maintain a clean decision ledger.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Collision resolution: choose how a new decision relates to an existing one, ensuring the decision graph remains accurate.
  • Context-for linking: attach new spans to existing decisions with clear confirmation or rejection, enabling smoother ratification.
  • Recovery and governance: supports recovery from session termination and prepares decisions for ratification when context is resolved.

Quick Start

Resolve the latest collision or context-for suggestion by calling bicameral.resolve_collision with the new and old decision IDs.

Frequently Asked Questions about bicameral-resolve-collision

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I resolve ingest collisions when overlapping decisions occur?

Resolve ingest collisions by applying supersede or keep_both modes to update decision statuses and maintain a consistent decision ledger.

What is the best way to handle supersession candidates during data ingest?

Handle supersession candidates by evaluating new decisions against existing ones and selecting a collision mode to supersede or retain both entries.

How do I confirm or reject context-for links during decision ingestion?

Confirm or reject context-for links by processing context_for_candidates during ingest, attaching new spans to existing decisions to enable smoother ratification.

How do I recover from a session drop with unresolved decision collisions?

Recover from session termination using preflight recovery workflows that identify and resolve unresolved collisions and pending context-for links.

Can I keep both decisions instead of superseding an existing one?

Use the keep_both collision mode to retain an existing decision alongside the new one, ensuring the decision graph remains accurate without losing data.