bicameral-scan-branch

Audit branch decisions affected by changed files and return drift statuses.

Updated Aug 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/BicameralAI/bicameral-mcp --skill bicameral-scan-branch
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: bicameral-scan-branch
Source: https://github.com/BicameralAI/bicameral-mcp/tree/main/.claude/skills/bicameral-scan-branch
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/BicameralAI/bicameral-mcp --skill bicameral-scan-branch

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Drift auditing across a branch analyzes decisions affected by changes and returns drifted, pending, and reflected statuses to streamline pre-merge review.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Single-call multi-file drift audit across the entire branch.
  • Scope-aware surfacing of drifted, pending, and reflected decisions to prioritize fixes.
  • Use case: before merging, identify drift in decisions tied to code changes.

Quick Start

Run the branch drift audit to assess all changes before merging.

Frequently Asked Questions about bicameral-scan-branch

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
What is drift detection in a git branch and how does it work?

Drift detection in a git branch analyzes code changes to identify decisions affected by those modifications. It works by returning drifted, pending, and reflected statuses for decisions, helping you prioritize fixes before merging.

How do I audit code drift across an entire branch before merging?

To audit code drift across an entire branch before merging, run a single-call branch drift audit. It analyzes decisions affected by changed files and returns drifted, pending, and reflected statuses to guide remediation and ensure alignment with product decisions.

Can I audit drift using base_ref and head_ref inputs for a specific range?

Yes, you can audit drift using base_ref and head_ref inputs to define a specific range. The audit reports sweep_scope and range_size alongside the list of drifted decisions, enabling targeted prioritization before merge.

Does branch drift auditing enforce grounding and sign-offs for product decisions?

Branch drift auditing enforces grounding and sign-offs for decisions affected by code changes. This ensures that drifted decisions are properly remediated and aligned with established product decisions before the branch is merged.

What is the best way to find pending and reflected decisions in a code review?

The best way to find pending and reflected decisions during a code review is to run a scope-aware drift audit. It surfaces these statuses across all changed files in one call, streamlining pre-merge review and prioritization.