bmad-advanced-elicitation

Apply structured elicitation methods to refine document sections.

1|Updated May 16, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/enigmaicon-eng/AI-Enterprise-OS --skill bmad-advanced-elicitation-enigmaicon-eng
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: bmad-advanced-elicitation
Source: https://github.com/enigmaicon-eng/AI-Enterprise-OS/tree/main/examples/BMAD-METHOD/src/core-skills/bmad-advanced-elicitation
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/enigmaicon-eng/AI-Enterprise-OS --skill bmad-advanced-elicitation-enigmaicon-eng

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps you improve a recent AI draft by applying targeted deeper-critique methods until the output is sharper, more complete, and more actionable.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Method-driven refinement: Selects from a registry of elicitation methods and applies them in a guided loop to the current content.
  • Interactive enhancement control: Lets you choose specific methods, reshuffle options, list all methods, or proceed when satisfied.
  • Integration-friendly behavior: Works when invoked indirectly by enhancing only the section content being generated, then returning the improved version.
  • Common use cases: Use it for socratic questioning, first-principles checks, pre-mortems, and red-team style critique to strengthen reasoning and reduce blind spots.

Quick Start

Invoke bmad-advanced-elicitation on your draft section and pick a numbered method from the options to generate an improved version for your document.

Frequently Asked Questions about bmad-advanced-elicitation

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I apply structured critique to improve an AI-generated draft?

Iterative document refinement uses a guided interaction loop to apply selected elicitation methods, such as socratic questioning and pre-mortems, to a draft. This method-driven process strengthens arguments and identifies gaps until the output is sharper and more actionable.

What is red teaming and how does it help with iterative document refinement?

Red teaming is a critique method used during iterative document refinement to stress-test reasoning and reduce blind spots. Applying red-team style critique identifies gaps and evaluates risks to strengthen the overall argumentation of generated content.

Can I use socratic questioning to strengthen specific sections of a document?

Yes, socratic questioning can strengthen specific document sections. The refinement process targets individual sections of a draft, applying method-driven elicitation to improve reasoning and address blind spots without rewriting the entire document.

How do I run a pre-mortem analysis on a draft to identify risks and gaps?

Running a pre-mortem analysis involves selecting the pre-mortem method from an elicitation registry and applying it to your content. This structured critique evaluates potential risks and identifies gaps before finalizing the enhanced document section.

Does this refinement method work when invoked indirectly by a workflow?

Yes, this refinement method works when invoked indirectly by a workflow. It enhances only the specific section content being generated and returns the improved version directly to the invoking workflow, making it integration-friendly for automated processes.

What are the limitations of using elicitation methods for deep critique?

A limitation of using elicitation methods for deep critique is the requirement to load techniques from a registry and manually select methods or reshuffle options. It targets specific section enhancement rather than autonomous full-document rewriting.